well, it looks like we are going to have a tough time rooting vehemently against everyone in miami next year, upon the revelation eddie house will be signing with the heat, according to the twitter of yahoo sports’ adrian wojnarowski. the deal is reportedly 2 years for 2.8 million dollars total, but don’t let those numbers fool you, it’s strictly a 2 year deal at the veteran’s minimum.

report: heat sign eddie house to two-year, $2.8 million contract

eddie house to sign with heat - peninsula is mightier

breaking news: eddie house to the heat | dime magazine (dimemag.com) : daily nba news, nba trades, nba rumors, basketball videos, sneakers

eddie house signs with miami, the dream is over - chicago bulls confidential

with the signing of eddie house, miami has completed most of its roster moves for the 2009-2010 season. after signing chris bosh, dwyane wade, and lebron james, the heat had to figure out who else to sign with the limited money remaining. with the goal of championships in mind, the heat went out and signed veteran contributors mike miller, zydrunas ilgauskas, eddie house, juwan howard, and eddie house. they've been praised for picking up so many shrewd veterans. however, was this truly the best plan to win championships?the legacy of signing veteran stars to would-be championship contenders is not particularly noteworthy. one can certainly point to the 2006 miami heat as a team that was victorious by signing veteran players around a bright young star. however, that team quickly tanked in the next two years, and had to be completely rebuilt. similarly, the 2004 los angeles lakers had to rebuild the point guard and power forward position after the departures of karl malone, gary payton, and horace grant. and ceremonial stars like mitch richmond and glenn robinson did nothing for their squads except generate frequent "he's still playing?" comments. plus, older players may get worn down more easily deep in the season and let the team down. look at how rasheed wallace struggled through game 7 this year. i argue that miami's signing plan was directly contradictory to their goal of winning multiple championships.so what else could miami have done besides signing these veteran players? if miami was truly interested in contending for multiple championships, here's an interesting proposal. why not follow more closely the path of the 2008 celtics? they had rajon rondo, kendrick perkins, and glen davis on the roster when the big three signed. all three markedly improved over time; one might argue that the players would have improved regardless, but i doubt it. i believe that stars help younger players to develop. miami could sign young players to cheap, long-term contracts, and develop them into complementary players to the big three. players like kenny hasbrouck, should they pan out, also provide attractive trade pieces because they will be overrated due to playing with stars who mask their deficiencies.miami's organizational structure is also excellent for player development, due to a holistic system that even monitors the players' weight. sure, some of the young players will not improve, but they can be easily jettisoned and replaced, or shuttled to the development league as needed. and although you hear plenty of talk about how miami has a recruiting advantage, let me ask you this. since expansion in the late 80's/early 90's, what successful nba team has been able to consistently lure high-quality veterans to its organization for less pay? the lessons from the recruitment of mcgrady, iverson, and shaq this off-season should also show that veteran players can be much harder to deal with than young players.i understand that after the draft, there are not that many talented rookie free agents out there. i'm not necessarily fond of signing complete rookies either; i would wish to sign players with a few years of professional experience. but the heat could also sign some developmental league players with experience, or sign younger european players instead. players like charlie bell, anthony parker, josh childress, and others passed on some nba opportunities because the pay was better in europe. the celtics' 2007 signing of eddie house, who had only played for 7 seasons (compared to mike miller's 10) to play guard is another example. the ability to play for a top nba team in a starting position and gain such exposure should be enough of a draw to bring a younger but experienced player back to the states.it just surprises me that with so many stars in their prime, miami is taking a "win-now" approach rather than taking a more long-term view. i definitely think this combination can win a championship. i just don't see it being easy to reload and replenish this squad in two years to create a true championship run. while young players in south beach carry their own risk, the veterans of 2007 and 2008 didn't necessarily seem the most disciplined or energetic, either. in a league where quick, young guards become more important each year, the signings of two guards over 30 (miller and house, although miller can also play the 3) are particularly odd, and i believe these choices will come back to hurt the heat. thoughts?